Skip to content

The critiques of evolution offered in such ID literature, however, is recognizable as a proper subset of the critiques offered by creation science literature, and they are no more valid.

— Eugenie Scott Not in Our Classrooms: Why Intelligent Design Is Wrong for Our Schools (2006)

Another quote →

More quotes by Eugenie Scott

ID, like creation science, has goals that are primarily religious.

Not in Our Classrooms: Why Intelligent Design Is Wrong for Our Schools (2006)

By now it should be clear that “teaching the controversy” is not about the concern for good pedagogy but about advancing the antievolution agenda.

Not in Our Classrooms: Why Intelligent Design Is Wrong for Our Schools (2006)

Thus, it seems clear that intelligent design should be considered a religion for First Amendment purposes.

Not in Our Classrooms: Why Intelligent Design Is Wrong for Our Schools (2006)

To a biologist, the “it’s just microevolution” argument is painfully obtuse.

Not in Our Classrooms: Why Intelligent Design Is Wrong for Our Schools (2006)

To be scientific in our era is to search for solely natural explanations.

Not in Our Classrooms: Why Intelligent Design Is Wrong for Our Schools (2006)

All Eugenie Scott quotes →

Attribution

Quote text and notes from Wikiquote: Eugenie Scott (page history), available under CC BY-SA 4.0. Source quality and labels are our own summary of what Wikiquote records.