People have far more stake in things when they can bring themselves to it through their own volition. That's not the approach I support in the change effort. That's how I would be thinking of it.
Source, in full
How does the NHL build policy initiatives that actualize these goals? With the Ivan Provorov incident, I'm sure you're sick of talking about it. Would the league ever consider punitive action for those who don't participate in these initiatives, or to incentivize participation in some way?