5 quotes
Hindus and Muslims can both be fanatics, but it is only Muslims (and Christians) who can be fundamentalists.
The Legacy of Muslim Rule in India (1992)
Its history is soaked in blood of the supposed enemies of Islam. But all this is denied by Marxists who always try to cover up the black spots of Muslim rule with thick coats of whitewash.
The Legacy of Muslim Rule in India (1992)
Here the feudal nobility was a military aristocracy which incidentally owned land, rather than a landed aristocracy which occasionally had to defend Royal lands and property by military means but at other times lived quietly.
The Legacy of Muslim Rule in India (1992)
A Hindu can not be a fundamentalist because there is nothing fundamental or obligatory in his socio-religious life, but he can be fanatic, a greater fanatic than all....
The Legacy of Muslim Rule in India (1992)
Jaisi, Rahim, Raskhan and Dara Shukoh, though no conventional philosophers, are rare phenomenon. Recognized leading lights of Islamic philosophy like Shaikh Ahmad Sarhindi, Shah Waliullah and Shah Ismail Shahid, find no place in the histories of Indian philosophy.
The Legacy of Muslim Rule in India (1992)