Skip to content

Quotes from Continuity and Rupture:Philosophy in the Maoist Terrain — J. Moufawad-Paul

Canada

← All quotes by J. Moufawad-Paul

6 quotes

Before 1988 Maoism did not exist. I begin with this counter-intuitive statement in order to clarify the particular theoretical position that is the concern of this book.

Continuity and Rupture:Philosophy in the Maoist Terrain (2016)

The process of continuity and rupture is internally defined by the process of universality and particularity.

Continuity and Rupture:Philosophy in the Maoist Terrain (2016)

We need to recognize that Maoism as a concept stands over and above the name of Mao Zedong, just as Marxism and Leninism must stand over the name of Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin, respectively.

Continuity and Rupture:Philosophy in the Maoist Terrain (2016)

In the now-failed socialist societies of Russian and China revisionist trends emerged to eventually reinstate capitalism and the latter revolutionary context waged a valiant struggle in an attempt to defeat this trend: the Cultural Revolution

Continuity and Rupture:Philosophy in the Maoist Terrain (2016)

If anything, Theory of the Subject is a work of Marxist philosophy that contains all of the contradictions reached by Marxism-Leninism, while being, at the same time, aware that these contradictions are contradictions insofar as they point to the necessity of a new rupture in revolutionary science.

Continuity and Rupture:Philosophy in the Maoist Terrain (2016)

Revisionists believe that the cardinal sin of communism is not opportunism but "infantile ultra-leftism" and, basing themselves on a selective reading of Lenin's analysis of ultra-leftism, will argue that any criticism of revisionist practice (any open demand for a revolutionary politics that produces militant practice) is the very ultra-leftism that threatens the left.

Continuity and Rupture:Philosophy in the Maoist Terrain (2016)

Attribution

Quotes and notes from Wikiquote: J. Moufawad-Paul (page history), available under CC BY-SA 4.0.